Age employees: what the employer needs to know
Elena Sidorenko shares information related to the employment of pre-retirement age employees in the company: whether additional reporting is needed for this, what are the features of concluding an employment…

Continue reading →

How to conclude a contract with a self-employed
How much noise the self-employed reform made! And all due to the fact that from January 1, 2019, law No. 422-FZ entered into force, which introduced a new tax regime…

Continue reading →

Digitalization or death: how Russian retailers fit into the new realities of trade
Venera Shaydullina talks about the digitalization trends of electronic and offline trading, cites the 5 most promising technologies that will have a strong impact on e-commerce in the near future,…

Continue reading →

5 rules to avoid director criminal liability risks

Often, company executives are held criminally liable for actions whose criminality they do not even realize – “ignorance of the law does not exempt from liability”. According to statistics, in recent years the number of cases where directors have been prosecuted has been steadily increasing. Directors are attracted for various types of fraud (Articles 159-159.6), embezzlement or embezzlement (Article 160), illegal business (Article 171), tax crimes (Articles 198-199.2) and other actions. Therefore, each director should know a number of basic rules that will help minimize the risks associated with criminal prosecution.

The first rule. Always check counterparties

The most common mistake made by company executives is a superficial check of counterparties. In cases where a company is convicted of entering into transactions with one-day firms, the manager may be held criminally liable for tax evasion from organizations.

For example, the general director of a joint-stock company was sentenced under paragraph “b” of part 2 of article 199 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (tax crimes) to two years in prison. The A-Mega company engaged third-party organizations – subcontractors to carry out the work. In connection with the conclusion of subcontracts, the company applied tax deductions. As a result, construction projects were completed on time, there were no complaints about quality, which was confirmed by relevant documents and testimonies of witnesses. On the part of the Federal Tax Service of Russia there were no claims to the documents confirming the fact of subcontracting, as well as their reflection on the accounts of accounting and tax accounting. However, one-day firms turned out to be subcontractors, which was the reason for bringing the head of A-mega company to criminal liability for tax evasion.

Due diligence on counterparties can help to avoid criminal liability.

Submit any reports to the IFTS and funds via the Internet in 5 minutes
Try for free

By the way! For a quick check of a counterparty, you can use the My Business online service. You can do this in one click by entering the TIN / BIN / name / full name or address of the counterparty of interest. You can get free access to the service right now at the link.

The second rule. Be attentive to your duties as a manager for coordinating and monitoring the activities of employees

We will consider this rule by the example of bringing the director to criminal liability for a fictitious employee, albeit not consciously, but paying wages.

The director of one metallurgical enterprise, on the oral instructions of a member of the board of directors, accepted an employee for the position of deputy director for development. This employee did not actually appear at the workplace, but, according to a member of the board of directors, performed his duties in good faith. For three years, a salary of 300 thousand rubles was paid monthly to the employee. During the inspection, law enforcement authorities found that the fictitious employee did not appear at work and did not carry out any activities in this company. A criminal case was instituted against the director on the grounds of corpus delicti, provided for in paragraph 4 of Article 160 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (embezzlement, that is, theft of property entrusted to the perpetrator). For this crime, the punishment can reach 10 years in prison.

This example demonstrates the need to carefully fulfill the immediate responsibilities of the leader, including the coordination and control of employees.

How to get a government order without a “shaggy hand”
One of the main reasons stopping entrepreneurs from participating in government tenders is the widespread belief that it is impossible to win a government order without a pullback. It is…

...

“The tail steers a dog”, or Three stories of real business
Svetlana Emelyanova, managing partner of STEP Consulting, shares three stories from business practice that describe the resistance of the company's employees to useful changes and innovations, and explains how to…

...

Corruption in the company: how to identify kickback schemes and defeat theft
Corruption - or theft in companies - is a very broad topic. Depending on the size of the company, the scope of activity, the presence or absence of a security…

...

Comparison of direct and reverse franchises: which is more profitable?
Evgeni Dobrinin compares two types of franchises - direct and reverse, lists the advantages and disadvantages of each option and explains which one is more convenient and profitable to work…

...