How to get a valuable employee
Nadezhda Zhivora explains how to attract an effective employee from another company to her: how to identify the “pain points” of a professional, how to formulate the benefits and prospects…

Continue reading →

How to increase profit per employee up to 59%
Statistics show that in most domestic companies only 25% of the efforts of employees bring results, and the remaining 75% are useless. How to increase labor productivity in your company…

Continue reading →

Transferring an employee to self-employed: opportunities and risks
In 2019, a new tax regime appeared in Russia - a tax on professional income. This regime is established by the Federal Law of November 27, 2018 No. 422-ФЗ "On…

Continue reading →

5 rules to avoid director criminal liability risks

Often, company executives are held criminally liable for actions whose criminality they do not even realize – “ignorance of the law does not exempt from liability”. According to statistics, in recent years the number of cases where directors have been prosecuted has been steadily increasing. Directors are attracted for various types of fraud (Articles 159-159.6), embezzlement or embezzlement (Article 160), illegal business (Article 171), tax crimes (Articles 198-199.2) and other actions. Therefore, each director should know a number of basic rules that will help minimize the risks associated with criminal prosecution.

The first rule. Always check counterparties

The most common mistake made by company executives is a superficial check of counterparties. In cases where a company is convicted of entering into transactions with one-day firms, the manager may be held criminally liable for tax evasion from organizations.

For example, the general director of a joint-stock company was sentenced under paragraph “b” of part 2 of article 199 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (tax crimes) to two years in prison. The A-Mega company engaged third-party organizations – subcontractors to carry out the work. In connection with the conclusion of subcontracts, the company applied tax deductions. As a result, construction projects were completed on time, there were no complaints about quality, which was confirmed by relevant documents and testimonies of witnesses. On the part of the Federal Tax Service of Russia there were no claims to the documents confirming the fact of subcontracting, as well as their reflection on the accounts of accounting and tax accounting. However, one-day firms turned out to be subcontractors, which was the reason for bringing the head of A-mega company to criminal liability for tax evasion.

Due diligence on counterparties can help to avoid criminal liability.

Submit any reports to the IFTS and funds via the Internet in 5 minutes
Try for free

By the way! For a quick check of a counterparty, you can use the My Business online service. You can do this in one click by entering the TIN / BIN / name / full name or address of the counterparty of interest. You can get free access to the service right now at the link.

The second rule. Be attentive to your duties as a manager for coordinating and monitoring the activities of employees

We will consider this rule by the example of bringing the director to criminal liability for a fictitious employee, albeit not consciously, but paying wages.

The director of one metallurgical enterprise, on the oral instructions of a member of the board of directors, accepted an employee for the position of deputy director for development. This employee did not actually appear at the workplace, but, according to a member of the board of directors, performed his duties in good faith. For three years, a salary of 300 thousand rubles was paid monthly to the employee. During the inspection, law enforcement authorities found that the fictitious employee did not appear at work and did not carry out any activities in this company. A criminal case was instituted against the director on the grounds of corpus delicti, provided for in paragraph 4 of Article 160 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (embezzlement, that is, theft of property entrusted to the perpetrator). For this crime, the punishment can reach 10 years in prison.

This example demonstrates the need to carefully fulfill the immediate responsibilities of the leader, including the coordination and control of employees.

OKR in the company, or Two tools to advance towards ambitious goals
Natalya Gulchevskaya talks about two tools within the company's management system for key results and goals (OKR) - visualization, progress meetings; shares personal experience of its implementation At the first…

...

Where does the cash gap come from and how to survive it
Irina Narchemashvili describes in detail situations in which a company falls into a cash gap and explains how to avoid this. Meet Vanya. He has an online store + showroom…

...

How to increase profit per employee up to 59%
Statistics show that in most domestic companies only 25% of the efforts of employees bring results, and the remaining 75% are useless. How to increase labor productivity in your company…

...

What is profitable for small businesses: three life hacks from an entrepreneur
Denis Martynov talks about promising niches for the development of small business in Russia, within the framework of which today it is possible to build an effective business: from various…

...